class: center, middle, inverse, title-slide # Analyzing Literature ## EDP 612 Week 6 ### Dr. Abhik Roy --- <script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.6.0/jquery.min.js"></script> <script type="text/x-mathjax-config"> MathJax.Hub.Register.StartupHook("TeX Jax Ready",function () { MathJax.Hub.Insert(MathJax.InputJax.TeX.Definitions.macros,{ cancel: ["Extension","cancel"], bcancel: ["Extension","cancel"], xcancel: ["Extension","cancel"], cancelto: ["Extension","cancel"] }); }); </script> <style> section { display: flex; display: -webkit-flex; } section p { margin: auto; } section { height: 600px; width: 60%; margin: auto; border-radius: 21px; background-color: #212121; } section p { text-align: center; font-size: 30px; background-color: #212121; border-radius: 21px; font-family: Roboto Condensed; font-style: bold; padding: 12px; color: #bff4ee; } #center { text-align: center; } .center p { margin: 0; position: absolute; top: 50%; left: 50%; -ms-transform: translate(-50%, -50%); transform: translate(-50%, -50%); } .center2 { margin: 0; position: absolute; top: 50%; left: 50%; -ms-transform: translate(-50%, -50%); transform: translate(-50%, -50%); } .tab { display: inline-block; margin-left: 40px; } </style> <style type="text/css"> .highlight-last-item > ul > li, .highlight-last-item > ol > li { opacity: 0.5; } .highlight-last-item > ul > li:last-of-type, .highlight-last-item > ol > li:last-of-type { opacity: 1; } </style>
--- class: highlight-last-item layout: true --- # Reference Text .center2[ <center>Please download</center><br><br> [Machi, L.A., & McEvoy, B.T. (2021). The Literature Review: Six Steps to Success (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.](https://libwvu.on.worldcat.org/oclc/1289372718) ] --- # Part I: Basic Overview --- ## Guideline 1 -- + Scan the articles to get an overview of each one -- + Read the first few paragraphs -- + Read the entire Methods section -- + Scan rest of article --- ## Guideline 2 -- + Based on your overview, group the articles by category -- + By topics and then subtopics -- + By chronological order within subtopic --- ## Guideline 3 -- Note: This slide will sound like study skills but it is still highly recommended! -- + Organize yourself before reading the articles -- + Computer -- + Pack of note cards to write your comments on -- + Self-adhesive flags that you can use to identify noteworthy comments (or word processing program to highlight) --- ## Guideline 4 -- + Use a consistent format in your notes -- + Example -- + Author(s)’ Last Name(s), Initial(s) -- + Title of Article -- + Publication Year -- + Name of Journal, Volume, Edition, Page Numbers -- + Notes --- ## Guideline 5 -- + Look for explicit definitions of key terms in the literature --- ## Guideline 6 -- + Look for methodological strengths --- ## Guideline 7 -- + Look for methodological weaknesses --- ## Guideline 8 -- + Distinguish between assertion and evidence -- + Assertion = author’s opinion -- + Evidence = results of study --- ## Guideline 9 -- + Identify the major trends or patterns in the results of previous studies -- + Generalization based on sources included in literature review --- ## Guideline 10 -- + Identify gaps in the literature --- ## Guideline 11 -- + Identify relationships among studies --- ## Guideline 12 -- + Note how each reviewed article relates to your topic --- ## Guideline 13 -- + Evaluate your reference list for relevancy and coverage -- + Should demonstrate latest work done in subject area --- # Part II: Analyzing Literature from the Viewpoint of a Researcher --- ## Guideline 1 + State whether the study is quantitative or qualitative -- + Research is neither quantitative or qualitative -- + So please do not say *the research was...* --- ## Guideline 2 -- + Determine whether a study is experimental or nonexperimental -- + *Experimental*. Treatments are administered to participants for the purposes of the study and their effects are assessed -- + *Nonexperimental*. Participants’ traits are measured without attempting to change them --- ## Guideline 3 -- + In an experiment, note whether the participants were assigned at random to treatment conditions -- + *True experiment*. Participants randomly assigned to treatment and control groups --- ## Guideline 4 -- + Note attempts to examine cause-and-effect issues in nonexperimental studies -- + *Causal-comparative*. Uncover relationships between independent and dependent variables after an action or event has already occurred -- > aka *retroactive* -- > aka *ex post facto* --- ## Guideline 5 + Note how the major variables were measured -- + *Valid*. Measure what they claim to measure -- + *Reliable*. Yield consistent results --- ## Guideline 6 -- + Note the characteristics of the samples of participants, such as -- + Demographics -- + Geographic location -- + Gender -- + Race -- + Ethnicity -- + Age -- + SES --- ## Guideline 7 -- + Note how large a difference is – not just whether it is statistically significant -- + So don't just report the `\(p\)`-value which by itself is nonsense --- ## Guideline 8 -- + It is safe to presume that all empirical studies are flawed -- + Never ever ever ever use the word "prove" when discussing results --- # Guideline 9 -- > Make note of the limitations within each study <br> <br> -- .pull-left[ These <span style="color:#d9534f;font-weight:bold;">are not</span> limits placed on<br>your own study due to another study! ] -- .pull-right[ These <span style="color:#428bca;font-weight:bold;">are</span> constraints placed on the<br>ability to generalize from the results ] -- <br> <br> <br> > Given enough of a pattern, this provides you with justification to conduct a study of your own without infringing on another -- >> Found by summarizing and synthesizing -- >> Ultimate purpose of the literaure review! --- # That’s it! Any questions?